Reports and briefings

Should the EU enforce or delay its Methane Regulation?

Download the pdf

Summary

The EU Methane Regulation is being weighed almost entirely against the price of this winter’s gas. This independent scientific assessment puts the science back into that decision. It finds that enforcing the rule does not threaten Europe’s energy supply. The bigger risk is whether it will cut methane at all, now that importers can comply through tradable certificates. Methane is the fastest lever we have on near-term warming, so getting this right matters.

‍

Key Insights

Key insights

  • The supply scare rests on one worst-case model. The claim that 43% of EU gas imports are at risk comes from a single industry-commissioned study that calls its own result “illustrative” and “not a forecast”. The same modelling shows 57% of 2027 imports already compliant.
  • Compliance is cheap. Independent modelling puts the cost at around €0.07 per MMBtu, roughly fifty times less than the cost of shipping the gas, and much abatement pays for itself through the gas recovered.
  • The real risk is paper compliance. In a loose certificate system, the cleanest producers can sell their credentials to the dirtiest, so imports look compliant while nothing changes at the wellhead.
  • Reported emissions are far below what is measured. Companies reporting through OGMP 2.0, the main voluntary reporting framework, cover around 42% of global oil and gas production, yet report under 2% of the emissions the Global Methane Budget attributes to the industry.

CCAG recommends enforcing the Regulation and completing national penalty regimes, setting strict certification criteria so a certificate reflects real, independently measured performance, and commissioning an independent evidence base ahead of the 2028 review.

Associated broadcasts

No items found.

News

Explore our latest news